We don't need a priest anymore....
by Plexicon | 14/01/2009 05:05:05![]() This is my last post. I'll keep it short. Blizzard makes almost 100 million a month in subscription sales. There total cost of operations is 200 million a year. With the extra money you are getting you need to hire some coders to get the job done quicker. Four to six month cycles for a patch is not fixing the state of the game. Blizzard has ignored threads of priest who I had respected as players with great ideas on how to fix things and it would be balanced with other healing classes. Face it, with the vast amount of resources you have had. You got lazy. This game is done as am I. I won't be blamed for wipes because of an encounter that is not adjusted because of the COH / WG nerf that is inc. One last thing, I do not enjoy playing a mini game in grid. I don't get to enjoy what's going on in the fight. Sometimes I don't even know the boss is dead until I see damage stop. That's pretty sad. Laters. [ Post edited by Plexicon ] |
by Ghostcrawler | 14/01/2009 10:01:34![]() Threads like this are tough because they start out bad and I just want to lock them but then Jastia goes and says some really smart things that I would love for people to see.
It’s ironic because we have actually ended up discussing priests so much lately. Usually the discussion starts with me asking other designers to help me understand the issue. I must admit to being at a little bit of a loss over why so many priests seem so dissatisfied with the class (and to be fair, there are many players there with the opposite feedback). I usually don’t find myself at such odds with the community, but in this case I am still having trouble understanding the issue. (And I apologize in advance to the druids, shamans and paladins who feel priest issues already dominate this forum.) I don’t honestly think that priests are just so upset about the CoH nerf that it makes them turn their back on the class. A lot of players seem really unhappy with the role of the priest as having lots of tools. I have a priest and I heal a lot. Prayer of Mending is a fun spell. Guardian Spirit is a fun spell. Those are just the tip of a pretty big toolbox. So if you want us to be on the same page, and certainly if you ever hope to see any changes that fix the problem for you, you’re going to have to put down your weapons, step away from the rhetoric, turn off the CAPS LOCK, and try and explain to us what we’re missing. |
by Ghostcrawler | 14/01/2009 22:14:55![]()
It is possible you are correct, Nightshroud. However in this case it doesn’t necessarily come down a vote of whether more priests are happy or unhappy. Clearly some preists are painfully unhappy, and since I tend to lean in your direction and think that priests are in pretty good shape, modulo some bugs, I am trying to understand their point of view. Some of you posit that priests just have some bugs or perhaps awkward mechanics or talent placements. Fair enough. We have fixed many bugs in 3.0.8 and we are looking at the talents for 3.1. However, my sense is that several of the posters on this thread are not talking about that. They are just unhappy with the priest’s role. That is why the toolbox analogies keep getting invoked.
I don’t think I would have said that. I said if Renew is as good as Regrowth / Rejuv or if Flash Heal is as good as Flash of Light, then you start to wonder what the other classes are for since priests can do it all. Priests absolutely can and do top the healing meters, if that is how you judge “on par.” Priests do and will get invited to top-raiding groups, if that is how you measure “on par.”
I think this is where you and I would differ. Just because you can’t out Flash a paladin does not mean you are mediocre. I think some priests are obsessing about “What if Blizzard is designing me to be the second place class?” We’re not, and I suspect if you go out there and use all of your spells, you will find you can keep a lot of people alive or achieve whatever milestone you personally use to define being a good healer. Mages and hunters are both ranged classes and use very different spells and abilities to do damage. That does not mean one of them is designed as the best dps class. One of them may dominate on some bosses and the other on other encounters, but that does not mean that a raid will stack all hunters and boot the mages. If the mages are good, they will get invites.
Perhaps it’s a troll (sometimes it is hard to tell), but it does point out something that I often try to encourage players to pay attention to. Many players claim ”everyone feels the way I do,” while conveniently ignoring the players that do not. Even the priests who say they are unhappy differ a lot on why they are unhappy or what the solutions are. I’m not saying Blizzard throws up our hands unless the community is 100% on lock step, because that never happens. I am asking you to be careful with waving around the words “everyone” or “all” too much. Some players are careful to say “in my opinion,” and we could probably stand a lot more of that. Trivia for you: Holy priest is the most common healing spec and one of the most common specs (top 5) in WoW at level 80. I am not using that to justify any arguments. I just thought you would find it interesting. |
by Ghostcrawler | 15/01/2009 01:52:37![]()
Yeah, I was up front about that. I think priests are fine, so that is why I am here trying to understand the players who disagree so we can find a common ground and possibly even fix the problems you are having. I was trying to caution the players who were saying something to the effect of fix our bugs and buff our spells and all will be right with the world, because I don't think that is what some of the concerned players are looking for. |


Recent Blizzard Announcements