Vigilance
by Dominika | 02/06/2010 06:59:55![]() It is pretty awesome. Let's talk about how great Vigilance is. I like it. WHY ARE YOU DOING THIS TO WARLOCK? |
by Ghostcrawler | 02/06/2010 18:53:52![]() The Taunt renew part of Vigilance is cool and being able to essentially Salv someone can be useful too. Actually gaining threat from using the ability makes it feel like Defiance 2.0 though. You feel like you have to use it all the time (not that that's a huge burden, but still) to achieve the threat levels that other tanks essentially get without the talent. [ Post edited by Ghostcrawler ] Ghostcrawler Lead Systems Designer |
by Ghostcrawler | 04/06/2010 07:50:56![]()
Yeah, I 'm inclined to agree. Vigilance has almost nothing to do with the amount of dps done by a tanking warrior in our minds. Tanks need to generate more threat than they do damage because our design is that you have to give up some of your dps in order to tank. Threat fills in that gap. As long as the threat generation scales with gear and isn't too far off from other tank classes then we don't think it's a problem. Warriors used to have a talent called Defiance, which increased your threat. If warriors had to pick that talent and paladins had no equivalent, then warriors would rightfully feel that they just received fewer talent points than paladins. That's the part of Vigilance that we're not crazy about. The rest of the ability isn't a problem and in fact can be useful and fun. Ghostcrawler Lead Systems Designer |


Recent Blizzard Announcements