Kalgan comments on Shaman in General
by Frogburger | 20/02/2008 23:50:16![]() The thread on the General forums that contained Kalgan's comments appears to have been deleted. I have quoted Kalgan's comments below and Kalgan himself has posted in this very thread. So this appears to now be where the discussion should take place.
*edit - removed link to deleted post and added intro. [ Post edited by Frogburger ] "The stats don't show a lack of popularity for shaman, they just show a ridiculous popularity for other classes." -- Tharfor - Europe CM |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 00:03:06![]()
I have no idea where the thread went lol. I'll check with the forum mods. We can pretend for now that it was this thread instead. |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 00:06:09![]()
Because one-dimensional massive burst damage isn't the way we want to achieve that balance. |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 00:20:42![]()
Yep, true. We do have buffs in the works for 2.4, it's just we don't know with 100% certainty exactly which ones they'll be, since some might not be do-able for now. |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 01:16:38![]()
Still reading it all. =] |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 01:24:08![]()
To be honest, we know the uproar is a natural part of it all. What matters is what the patch looks like once it actually goes live, and how it actually affects the game. The PTR forum mayhem while things are still in transition is something that will pass and be forgotten, as it is witch each patch. |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 02:02:13![]()
That's what people say every patch, it hasn't ever been true though (not that I'd want it to be). =] |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 02:06:25![]()
Because not every class is intended to have cc. That was a conscious decision made many years ago for the sake of class diversity. I wouldn't expect this to change, other than cc versus elementals (which obviously wouldn't really be "pvp cc"... other than the occasional funny team that will be named something like "Jackin' Yo Water Ele Dawg"). |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 02:10:33![]()
I certainly don't think of Paladins or Warriors as having substantial cc either, the definition is somewhat vague. |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 02:17:14![]()
Yes, there's just a huge difference between whether having a one-shot ability like intim shout makes anyone feel like "yeah, my class has cc", versus a re-usable mechanic like cyclone/poly/etc (for example). |
by Kalgan | 21/02/2008 02:24:55![]()
I don't think "anything" would really satisfy. Do tauren shamans feel like they have no need for the cc you're asking for since they have war stomp? Probably not. All it would do to give every shaman that kind of "cc" is water down the feeling of distinction without really solving much (at least for now now... maybe someday in the future could be just the perfect solve for some balance problem, but today it would be marginal). |


Recent Blizzard Announcements