CoH: AHAHAHAHAHAHAH
by Alprazolam | 27/09/2007 19:41:44![]() I'm sorry When I read about the changes to CoH I *almost* fell out of my chair laughing. Yea it's receiving a bonus from +healing gear! Yaaay! I totally love how they stage the change in this light, when in reality it's totally diff. Take a look at this blue post and read it thouroughly (Mainly the last Paragraph): Anything a Priest can Look Forward to 2.3?
Maybe comedians run Blizzard.... Stealth Comedians IMO If I had to bet I think this change came about like this: "Hey...I know how to make CoH useful! Lets put a certain mark of +healing you have to reach and then it will be more effective. Otherwise anything under that will still receive+healing bonus right?....should we leave it the same? In it's already horribly useless state? What do you guys think? Nah lets make anyone under this mark actually see a DECREASE in effectivness......" "Ksoundsgoodlol, let me getoff onmy(lol) *my lock and we'll figure out a number for the +healing" "It's cool...1338...let's call it even." AHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHHAHA 0100100001101001 |
by Nethaera | 27/09/2007 20:19:52![]() Try a more constructive post without the all cap title please. |
Hot: View Nethaera's Comments on Class Balancing in Patch 2.4


Recent Blizzard Announcements

