Blizzard's attitude re: class balance is sad
by Twynkl | 14/03/2008 16:01:34 "I do pretty well in battlegrounds with mine, but if I'm going to want to be viable in higher end competition then I would be well advised to respec. That isn't to say that shadow priests won't one day be more viable than they are now in PvP, or that changes may not come for other specs to help them become more viable. The point is that not every spec for every class should be expected to be as viable as the next for each aspect of the game. [edit]I'll qualify this statement and say that this is our general take on spec viability for now, and isn't necessarily intended to be taken as the end all look at spec comparisons in various aspects of the game for all future balance and development. That possibly was not made as clear as it should have been in my original post in the other thread, and certainly not very clear in this one. [ Post edited by Drysc ]" Lol at Drysc covering his backside. Your first post was more honest (and more disappointing). While we can all certainly understand that not all specs/classes can be perfectly balanced, this attitude of, "oh well, suck it up player base" combined with "you never know when we might make improvements!" is pathetic. There have been numerous, well thought out, respectful posts on how to improve enh shamans, balance druids, shadow priests, etc. in arenas. Blizzard just fails at implementation. Lol, they can't even figure out how to nerf a particular spec to bring them into balance. Even with the changes they've made to resto druids I predict they will still rule the charts in 2.4 in 2s. And the qq'ing will continue :). GG. |
by Bornakk | 14/03/2008 16:21:20
Hmmm.... this idea is good. |
News
Spam
Hot: View Nethaera's Comments on Class Balancing in Patch 2.4
Most Viewed 
Recent Blizzard Announcements
