A Plea for my Druid Brethren: Swipe
by Naarikun | 24/02/2009 18:59:50![]() Isn't it high time that the target requirement of Swipe was removed? It's already the WORST AoE threat tool in the game (half the area of of others AND it requires your current target be in melee range to use). Why not show the druids a little love and let Swipe be a simple AoE like Thunderclap? (Still directional, if you insist, of course). |
by Ghostcrawler | 10/03/2009 21:35:39![]() We are going to take another look at Swipe. Since we are trying to fix some problems where druids are too good at tanking it seems reasonable to also look at cases where they struggle. Please don't follow this up a dozen threads that say "My class needs compensation for nerfs too!" We generally don't offer compensation for nerfs since they are supposed to be nerfs. But in this case we are trying to realize our goal of having 4 viable MT classes and druid AE threat generation is cumbersome. |
by Ghostcrawler | 11/03/2009 05:14:34![]()
This is true. The benefit of Thunderclap is it does a lot of threat in one application. The downside is that if the warrior needs AE threat while it's on cooldown, he needs to use another ability (Shockwave if talented, or perhaps Challenging Shout.) Consecrate and DnD have their downsides too. They tick, which is nice from a hands off approach. But it's also really easy for a moving add to make it all the way through the pool without getting a tick on them. We were okay with Swipe being a little harder to use, since when it was used well it was just as effective as other AEs. But we now wonder if it has gone too far from a test of skill to a liability that makes people not want to group with druid tanks. Nobody wants to hear "Oh, just let the paladin grab the adds. It will be easier." It was humiliating in Karazhan for the Holy paladin to tank the ghosts that the warrior or druid couldn't hold down. (No disrepect to the pallies.) |


Recent Blizzard Announcements